|
|
ALPHETA'S
LITERARY AGORA
BOOK REVIEWS
.
Birth
of the Chess Queen
by Marilyn Yalom
Harper Collins
2003, 304 pages
$24.95
On
the Costa del Sol, near the narrow Strait of Gibraltar that separates
Spain from Morocco, the crowned figureheads of the present age play,
royal and nonroyal millionaires of all nations and faiths (not to
mention legions of red-faced package tourists). If they choose, they
can spend their leisure hours sunbathing, shopping at Hermes, dancing
at discotheques or speeding to the Malaga airport in their Porsches
and Rollses along highways posted with signs in Spanish and Arabic.
It was
by these Andalusian beaches that the Moors landed in the early eighth
century, bent on conquest. Once things simmered down, the region's
new Islamic leaders needed a sociable pastime to engage in with the
movers and shakers who visited their courts. Designer boutiques had
yet to be invented, but, luckily, someone had thought to pack chess
in his war duffel before heading north. The game caught on and spread
to Italy, France, England, Germany, Scandinavia and Russia, becoming
a must-have accessory for the leisure classes. As early as the 10th
century, when Muslim, Christian and Jewish glitterati male and female
gathered in the sumptuous, tolerant court of the caliph Abd al-Rahman
III at Cordoba, a hundred miles north of Marbella, chess was an established
part of the luxury landscape. But the game they played was not the
game we know today.
In ''Birth
of the Chess Queen,'' a wide-ranging exploration of the origins of
chess and of its most powerful piece -- the queen -- the Stanford
gender scholar Marilyn Yalom, author of ''A History of the Wife,''
''A History of the Breast'' and other record-correctors, has rattled
the vaults of Europe to shake out the missing-link chess pieces that
show the game's evolution on the Continent. Her fossil record is chessmen
made of marble, crystal, bone and jewel-encrusted gold, and in these
relics' changing contours she traces the rise and spread of female
power and prestige across Europe in the Middle Ages.
Yalom
definitely has a point: the game that washed up on the beaches of
the Costa del Sol had no chessmen, it had chess lumps, because the
Koran forbade the depiction of living creatures like men, women and
horses; also, it had no queen. The king's sidekick was a man -- the
vizier -- and was the weakest piece on the board, permitted to move
only one measly square per turn, on the diagonal. (Indeed, games that
feature the vizier and abstract pieces live on, mostly in the Middle
East and India.) The game we know today in the West had begun to take
shape by the end of the 10th century, when the chess queen surfaced
in manuscripts in a Swiss monastery; in the 11th century, ivory chess
queens turned up in Italy; and in Spain, a queen with a face finally
appeared in the 12th century. Dwarfed by her ivory throne, she looks,
Yalom writes, as if she were ''sitting in a bumper car.'' The queen
needed those bumpers over the next 300 years, as she transformed herself
into the crowned powerhouse that we and Garry Kasparov recognize today,
who swoops across the board, forward and backward, diagonally and
sideways, knocking down any knight, pawn, bishop or rival queen in
her path. However did she do it?
Yalom's
entertaining (and credible) contention is that the booting of the vizier
and the coronation of the queen are linked to the rising status of women
in medieval Europe: ''The miraculous Virgin, the chess queen and the
beloved lady grew up together and reinforced one another,'' she explains,
referring to the cult of the Virgin Mary and the tradition of courtly
love. Also crucial, Yalom believes, was the example of medieval warrior
queens, who made a chessboard without a queen seem as incomplete as
a Ferrari without an engine.
In Spain
there was Toda of Navarre, in the 10th century, who went to battle
to install her grandson on the throne of Leon; and Urraca of Galicia,
who divorced her husband, King Alfonso I of Aragon and Navarre, waged
war on him (she won), retook Portugal and then a lover; and (skipping
a few generations of Amazons) Queen Isabella of Castile, who united
the country, financed Christopher Columbus's foreign travel, exiled
Spain's Jews, expelled the Moors and in her spare time ran the Spanish
Inquisition. Elsewhere in Europe, there was Adelaide of Burgundy (later
a Holy Roman empress), Matilda of Tuscany (she led her troops into
battle on horseback) and Catherine the Great. Roping in two others,
Eleanor of Aquitaine in France, whose court was a beacon to courtly
love, and the pious Marianist, Blanche of Castile, Yalom declares,
''Their illustrious reigns coincided with the spread of chess in France
and England, and enhanced the prestige of the queen on the board.''
But the
queen's apotheosis nixed the game's popularity among female players.
The vizier's feeble powers of movement had made the game slow and
not too complex, so much so that at early medieval baby showers noble
ladies received postpartum chess sets. The fiction of the era is rife
with stories of Muslim princes and Christian princesses (and vice
versa), who fall in love while playing and convert to the victor's
faith. By the late Middle Ages, the game of chess was so widely understood
as a metaphor for seduction that there was a ''Book of Erotic Chess,''
strip-chess scenes were carved on ivory caskets, and a checkerboard
illustration on a book of romantic poetry would set pulses racing.
By the
eve of the Renaissance, a game that had grown popular as a harmless
diversion for grown-ups, only a bit more challenging than Hi Ho! Cherry-O,
had turned into a showcase for fast-paced intellectual combat. ''New
chess was no longer suited to leisurely encounters between ladies
and gentlemen that could last a day or more, with interruptions for
eating, drinking, dancing and singing, or, in more plebeian settings,
for stirring the pot and nursing the baby,'' Yalom writes. The antipathy
has persisted: in the year 2000, women were estimated to constitute
only 5 percent of players worldwide.
The game
that we play, or rather, that men (overwhelmingly) play today is known
as ''Queen's chess.'' Back in the day, its detractors called it ''Mad
queen's chess,'' -- scacchi alla rabiosa to the Italians,
esches de la dame enragee to the French -- Yalom notes, evoking
''a wild, furious, maddened person driven to violent action, as well
as the fear one felt in the presence of such a rabid creature.'' One
wonders what they would have made of Bobby Fischer. Some critics,
Yalom adds, ''became openly hostile to the chess queen and would have
removed her from the board, had that been possible.''
Fortunately
for Yalom and her diverting book, it was not possible. And yet, it may
not be a bad thing that the jet-setters who bump moisturized elbows
these days mostly avoid chess as they unwind in the game's historic
terroir. If they play on the board at all, it's more likely to be backgammon.
Another centuries-old game with Persian roots and a European makeover,
backgammon has no known relevance to feminist history, and its pieces
are so abstract in shape that they are known as blots. It's got nothing
like a dame, which makes backgammon a little less complicated than chess
to play over a glass of cava on the beach. Not to mention shorter.
Marilyn
Yalom is a senior scholar at the Institute
for Women and Gender at Stanford University. She is the author of A
History of the Wife; A History of the Breast; Blood Sisters:
The French Revolution in Women's Memory; and Maternity, Mortality,
and the Literature of Madness. She lives in Palo Alto, California,
with her husband, psychiatrist and writer Irvin Yalom.
|