ARCHIVES
The
I.G.K. Fifth Symposium Hamburg 1999
Don
McLean's Diary
Wallace in Wunderland: Part IV
Hamburg - Day
3 - Sunday, November 28th, 1999
It
was already well into "day three" of the convention by the time I finished
my daily journal and turned in for the night. Although I had a rough
idea of what to expect on that last day of our gathering, my major concern
remained with the kind of sleep (or lack thereof) I had been experiencing
and the effects that might have on my overall stamina.
I was obviously
over stimulated - and my dreams seemed to follow suit. There were vivid
and not so vivid dreams, often filled with an unusual amount of intense
conversation and voices. Among these, a cryptic message to look for
"something" in the symbol of "The Joker" had me up and on my feet just
seconds before my alarm clock began its annoying buzzer sound. The interruption
was enough to derail my focus and banish the exact wording of this message
into whatever margin is reserved for half-forgotten dreams. Still, I
managed to hold onto the gist of what had struck me as being portentous
at the time - the fleeting ghost of a fleeting premonition.
Despite
having only four unsteady hours of rest, I felt remarkably good that
morning - confident that I would make it through the remaining agenda
and my upcoming presentation without sacrificing clarity or focus. I
had already guessed what might come about following the last round of
meetings - and sensed that I had just enough gumption to get me through
before I would "hit the wall" and suffer some inevitable collapse.
After the
ritual toying with the idea of wearing the suit and tie I had brought
with me, once again I rejected them. Clad in the now customary sweater,
jeans and white running shoes, I meandered down to the breakfast hall.
It was Sunday and although I might have been a bit early, to my surprise
no IGK members seemed to be present.
I chose
my table and proceed to eat a solitary breakfast. In due course however,
I was joined by the Dutch chess expert Herr F.R. van der Vliet of the
Hague, who posed an interesting and unexpected survey of questions regarding
my interest in music in general and the "music of chess" in particular.
Whereas my classical background is quite limited - subordinate to a
much richer appreciation for contemporary styles - this did not seem
to matter in the slightest. Like many Europeans, Mr. van der Vliet remained
quite enthusiastic about the Buddy Hollys and the Big Boppers of 50's
era rock, which I found both amusing and disarming. I had not really
expected these names to be spoken in the same breath as Mozart or J.S.
Bach, even though I had always pictured these distinguished classical
composers as being the superstars of their day. All the more intriguing
were the vague and uncertain impressions of what I felt had to be the
most fragile of connections between the chess world and the music world.
I had never put them together very effectively even though, from the
very beginning, I harboured the suspicion that Terpsy's interest was
well justified. Now an expert was confronting me with the possibility
that some clues did exist that would help tie the two together.
Even as
I write this recap, I await whatever information Mr. van der Vliet will
forward. I do hope he has not forgotten me. His sources and facts may
prove quite helpful in opening up new avenues for Goddesschess aspirants
and researchers. Certainly the Goddess "knows" music just as she "knows"
chess. Whether secular or non-secular, the creative origins of either
magnum opus seem born of similar processes. Whether we see chess as
the a symphony of complex movements or the short ditty that most of
my games usually turn out to be, at root of all seems to be an endless
fountain of resources and inspiration - a well of permutation and recombination
that truly never runs dry. Though chess history may sometimes be a very
arid affair, as Dr. Calvo has suggested, the sixty-fifth square is a
good place to look for the "water of life". We shall point our compass
in that direction a little later on.
If there
was anyone seated in the room who thought for a minute that the game
of chess was less art than science, the subsequent lectures of the day
did much to dispel such notions. In his passionate and at times fascinating
lecture on the origins of the game, Herr Yuri Averbach spoke authoritatively
on the creative impetus that helped carry the game from its earliest
beginnings on through its more modern incarnations. His suggestion that
the artistic processes that helped forge the current version of International
Chess were not always operant and that stagnation in these efforts often
created the illusion of the game as being trite and mechanical. Thus,
in his speech it was easy to see that Mr. Averbach made a clear distinction
between the vital re-creative aspects of the game's development and
the less vital aspect of problem analysis, the latter of which seemingly
ties in with a kind of "bureaucracy" of chess.
In effect,
as I have discovered in my as yet unfinished reading of Ray Reid's Chessmayne
web site, chess is not reductable to mere algorithms and mathematical
tables. Heuristic analogies or creative thought process figure into
the game as much if not more than the mathematical conventions - and
so, despite the apparent formality, these conventions call upon fluid
interpretive powers for their just appointment to the game of the day,
the hour and the minute - the minutiae of difficult situations. Just
as most gifted musicians maintain a certain amount of flexibility in
their "interpretation" of the classics, so the chess board is an open
invitation to explore and recreate whole new worlds of thought, emotion
and experience. If at some time in the future, our current game fails
to carry the day, we can be sure that it will eventually become the
object of some creative scrutiny. The "Chess Variants" web page already
bears ample evidence of this fact and shows that an astounding number
of variations and modifications have already entered the lists, thereby
magnifying the scope of creative processes which infuse the original
game with added vigour and insight.
Nowhere
were the "creative" and "remunerative" possibilities more in evidence
than in Ken Whyld's address on the aspect of "Medieval Wager Compositions"
which followed Mr. Averbach's presentation. A colourful speaker with
a colourful topic, Mr. Whyld charmed the IGK with his demonstration
of a series chess problems which would not have looked too out of place
in a Las Vegas Casino. Throughout history, men have devoted disproportionately
high amounts of time to the task of winning something at the expense
of those less clever, less skilled, or less well-informed. In fact,
the history of chess is strewn with examples of how individual freedoms,
entire fortunes and noble reputations have been won or squandered over
variously advised gambits. Mr. Whyld's demonstration repeatedly showed
that the chess croupier or mountebank could stake out deceptive positions
leading to the entrapment of innocent gamblers. Chess rakes and chess
stakes were perhaps a peculiar phenomena - a spin-off which gave rise
to social problems and ethical conundrums during the Middle Ages. While
perverse turns of fate could lead to any number of bad ends for the
feckless, it was perhaps with regard to such outcomes that Papal and
Royal edicts banning chess from some states and estates pepper the general
history of the game during that time.
Before
I knew it, the time had come for me to deliver an edict of my own -
an open challenge to those assembled. Oyez! Oyez! Oyez! Although I had
three pages of notes which I had appended into my Goddesschess info
package, I knew from what Herr Meissenberg had informed me earlier that
morning, that my address would have to be short and to the point. Naturally,
the notes went "out the window" in what I presume must have been among
the shortest addresses ever given at a Koenigstein summit.
Sometimes
less is more... and in what must have been a delivery which spanned
no more than five minutes, I did manage to convey my appreciation on
behalf of Goddesschess for the invitation to speak, however briefly,
on the topic of Chess History and the Internet. With a copy of the Goddesschess
brochure in hand, I nervously extemporized on the merits of cooperative
research, the opportunity that various Internet message boards and dedicated
websites could provide to researchers and readers alike, as well as
initiatives already underway at Goddesschess to help create a weave
of cross indexed posts. Additionally, I also felt the need to outline
some of the possible pitfalls of copyright which new forms of encryption
might someday address, while hopefully making it clear to most that
theft or plagiarism could occur just as easily off the printed page
as the electronic one. Ultimately, my appeal was made on behalf of the
sharing of an adventure and the development of a particular form of
consciousness through synergistic efforts, not only of facts - but of
feelings, ideas, values and attitudes - all the intangible but no less
real substances for which Goddesses of many nations, culture and races
are famous.
"Honit
soit qui mal y pense."
While men
of war may contend that what they perceive requires contending and while
the material aspect of life, death, the universe and everything has
its sway in the minds of many beholders, behind the veil of what we
perceive to be the unvarnished "reality", there lurks a triune figure
which, throughout the centuries, rag tag mobs of free thinkers have
perpetually beheld to be more inviolable and consistent than truth itself.
We make neither defense, nor excuse, nor apology for whatever it is
that inspires progress among humankind. It requires none and for asks
none. Our only service is in the service of the kind of Truth which
manifests independently of what we would like our objective truths to
be, or what might fit our intellectual convenience.
"Quid est
veritas?"
While wars
may rage and power plays run rampant across the latitudes and longitudes
of our spinning globe, while noble histories lie fragmented and fallen
under the heap of rubble and the clash of politically expedient norms
and sanctions, some things do not change. Man and womankind have ever
had their hearts and deepest inner longings bear witness to a process
that lies both within and without and which, in all ways, permeates
the entire fabric of our existence, forming an escapable weave - a net,
a pattern of recombining thought, word and deed. In sum, these simply
mirror the eternal pageant - the recreative struggle to give birth to
greater refinements and more astute appreciation for those things which
can be better viewed as a "process" rather than an end in themselves.
"Look upon
my works oh ye mighty and despair!"
Many
see the triune Goddess as the symbolic and eternal initiator and receptor
of all earthly forms and while some may see only emptiness and subjective
mythologizing, we know what the Buddha had to say about form and emptiness.
Beyond, beyond - out of sight and out of mind, on that sixty-fifth square,
the board of life avails an opportunity and an eternal secret. From
the grave or beyond it, as anyone who has ever fought, won or lost an
earnest battle of any kind must attest, we do live to fight again. That
some may view such attitudes as dangerous heresy and an affront to good
science, is the pitch which allows others to distinguish between the
limits of reason and unlimitedness of more intuitive calculations. As
theoretical physicist are coming to understand, while we live in a world
of number, the hearts which inform the very dipolar substance of our
being bring about a logos which can be perceived less by mathematics
than by feeling and experiencing a divine unity that, in and of itself,
knows no gender, no limits, nor any inwardly or outwardly contentious
moments.
Let the
skeptics come. Let them rub against the rough walls of our Lady of Towers.
Let them attempt, if they will, to undermine the battlements and drain
the moat. It is hopeless to contend. Forever we become the thing that
we oppose, even as the skeptic will ever be snared in his or her own
skepticism, led by the nose, often blindly and unwittingly into the
labyrinth of soul and spirit - the catacomb of fear and hope and love
wherein Our Lady presides tenderly over her Church of Chess, the game
of the Goddess and the inheritance of all those curious children who
flock to her miracle.
Copyright
Donald A. McLean, 1999